Thursday, March 12, 2020

Book Club Experience


I came to work early to attend my coworker’s book club. They were discussing The Light in the Ruins by Chris Bohjalian, and my answers might have some spoilers for the book itself (fair warning). Aside from the leader (my coworker), Linda (who was also observing), and myself, four other people attended the group. ILoveLibraries estimated about 8-16 people for book clubs, but this size group worked much better than that size would, since it gave everyone ample time to bond and share their thoughts.

Who is asking the questions, is there a leader or do people take turns?
My coworker was the conversation leader and asked most of the questions in order to get a discussion going. Some of the other attendees asked questions as they came up, but they were mostly for clarification.

If there is a leader, does the leader answer the questions as well or let the attendees respond first?
The discussion was very open, so my coworker would mostly pose questions to the group and share her impressions once the other attendees had shared theirs. It was very conversational, and she mostly let attendees get their share in. Her style reminded me of Hoffert’s discussion of the leader as a facilitator, as she guided the conversation when needed but could also step back and be a neutral presence too (which allowed the attendees to speak up).

What type of questions are asked? Any involving just yes or no answers?
Most of my coworker’s questions centered around the attendees’ perceptions of the book (i.e. “What did you think of this book?”, “Did anyone try to figure out who did it? Was anyone right?”, “This character said they had to do this, but do you think they really had to?”, etc.). A few questions (like the last two examples) were yes or no questions, but they invited elaboration. None of the questions were closed to just a yes or no answer. She also shared a few of her own perceptions of the book, which were phrased as non-question questions (i.e. “I had thought this character was going to have a bigger role in the book…” which allowed attendees to weigh in on the character).
Most of the attendees’ questions were to clarify or ask the others’ opinions (i.e. “Was the murderer demented? Why did they do it?”, “This event was during the wartime, right?”, “Why did the murderer remove their hearts?”, “Was this character the one whose father was a surgeon or was that someone else?”, etc.).

Do all attendees actively participate? Do any attendees swoop in and steal all the spotlight?
All of the attendees had a good rapport already, so they were all very enthusiastic in sharing their thoughts about the book. They also jumped to connect the book to their own experiences and really seemed to bond over that personal discussion. No one “swept in” or “stole all the spotlight”- it was a very egalitarian conversation.

What is the atmosphere of the discussion, where is it taking place at?
The discussion was held in my library’s meeting room, and everyone sat in chairs around pushed-together tables. It was a very friendly and informal atmosphere, with a smaller group than usual (four people). Everyone seemed to already know each other (although name tags were still provided), so it felt like a lot like a social meeting even though the discussion was about the book.

Are snacks or drinks provided?
The book group was called the “Coffee Talk” book discussion, so there were snacks and coffee available. My coworker said she tries to go to local businesses for snacks- today was different kinds of candies (truffles, marshmallows, etc.).

What types of books does this book club normally discuss?
This group apparently discusses a variety of books, but mostly historical fiction. They discussed trying more nonfiction at the end of the meeting, offering histories or biographies as options. The books they listed for previous meetings appear to be close to literary or relationship fiction as well (but primarily historical). It reminded me of the Vienna Court Book Club in Goldstein’s article, since everyone’s encouraged to recommend books that align with their personal preferences (33).

9 comments:

  1. Since this was at your workplace, did anyone recognize you as a librarian and look to you to guide the group?

    Did your coworkers and the attendees know your were observing for a class? Did you participate in the discussion or did you strictly observe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My coworker let everyone know I was observing at the beginning of the meeting, and I mostly stayed out of it. I tried to treat it like the secret shopper and not interfere (although this was a much better experience)!

      Delete
  2. I like that they use local sources to outsource snacks. Gosh, I need to move to a real town.
    Is there more than one book club offered? I only ask because you said it's usually historical fiction and wondered if there were other niches people could hop into as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes! Our library has eight locations so there's different book clubs throughout the system.

      Delete
  3. So if your co-worker was observing as well- do you think having 2 additional non participants changed the flow of the book club? Do they choose the books as a group or does your other co-worker that leads the book club make the decision?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The coworker who leads the group decides the titles but asks members of the group for suggestions (and I think she tries to use the suggestions as much as possible). I'm not sure how the book club normally goes, but everyone seemed to get along normally even though Linda and I were there.

      Delete
  4. The book club I attended had nine people including the librarian. I think I would prefer a book club that had fewer people, especially if it was a book with weighty topics. It would be easier to have more intimate conversations with fewer people that is for sure. I agree with you that it can be better (up to personal preference of course) to have fewer than the normal 8 to 16 people in attendance as estimated by ILoveLibraries.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I love that name tags were provided even though it seems like this club has a lot of regulars. I'm not great at names, and if I've only met someone a few times for an hour or so with large spans of time in between meetings, there's no hope for me haha. I think this is a great idea for those of us with a spottier memory :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. comments noted - see canvas for grade

    ReplyDelete